Sixty years ago (abt 1930), much ws written about the use of euphemism by Nazi officials who controlled Germany's death centers.  More recently, Professor William Brennon of St. Louis University has explained how language tranquilized the German populace while 12 million people were put to death - and how it has tranquilized America while 30 million unborn children have been mercilessly killed and dehumanized. In The Abortion Holocaust, a 200-page comparison between German Nazi and American killing practices, Professor Brennon notes that the perpetrators' strategy in any holocaust is to degrade their victims to a level of nonpersons and then provide a positive account of what happens to them.  The process begins with "choice," and esteemed democratic term, and ends with "evacuation" (of "congenital defectives" to German death camps - and of "uterine content" in American abortuaries).  The process, we are told, is a "service" that's "safe and legal" and carried out "humanely," with "manifest cleanliness," for the "welfare" of society. In Choicespeak:  Language to Abort the Conscience, Robert Evangelisto explains how abortion proponents focus not on killing of children but on "choice" and accuse life defenders not of being pro-life, but of being "anti-choice," and thereby anti-American.  Notes Evangelisto, via, choicespeak, a baby becomes the "product of conception"; the scientific fact that a human being's life starts at conception  becomes "a religious idea"; and the killing of the child in utero becomes "termination" of pregnancy; abortion is the "termination" of a child. Little Zachary Five months old, escaped abortion and not lives happily with his grandparents.  As other American children, he could have been legally aborted on the day of his birth. California Medicine, official journal of the California Medical Association, editorialized in 1970 (Vol. 113, No, 3) :  "The very considerable semantic gymnastics which are required to rationalize abortion as anything but taking a human life would be ludicrous if they were not often put forth under socially impeccable auspices.  It is suggested that this schizophrenic sort of subterfuge is necessary because while a new ethic is being accepted, the old one has not yet been rejected."  It is therefore the duty of linguistic corruption to disassociate "killing" from the practice of abortion.  Wrote the prophet Isaiah [Isaiah 5:20]: "Woe to those who call evil good, and good evil, who change darkness into light and light into darkness, who change bitterness into sweet, and sweet into bitterness." Woe to the perpetrators of choicespeak!!